I attended a workshop where the OU sought views from OU staff, students, and alumni about the Social:Learn project. I haven’t been so enthralled by a workshop in years and I have been pondering why that should be. I think there are two main reasons:
- Content
- Connections
Content:
The social:learn project is fascinating. It started in response to the nightmare scenario of someone picking up the best of the free web2 tools, social networks and some dynamic Associate Lecturers to make an online university to compete with the OU. The social:learn team have tried to do the same, but for the OU, instead of against it. The result is not just another tool, but a way of thinking about higher education that provides a place for a learning network online. Martin Weller’s slideshare explains it fully. There will be tools, which I will write about in another post, but the glue is a place to organise, share and record learning online in a social way. This may sound like nothing new, but the revolutionary part, for me, was the premise that although the ‘glue’ will be OU, the tools and services interacting with the system will be chosen by the students. The big question is: will students grok it?
Connections:
I had already ‘met’ several of the conference participants through twitter, seesmic and the closed ning network set up for the workshop. Meeting them in person was great, but our previous use of web 2 social networks lead to an amazing back channel during the workshop and presentations. There was plenty of social chat, mostly about the free chocolate, but rather than a distraction, this added to the general conversation and thought processes, with ideas being discussed in real time in the room and being added to the ning network or picked up later in question sessions. If we could get students this involved in their lectures could it revolutionize the way they learn? Reingold has suggested that we make use of the back channel and engage with it which is exactly what was happening here.
June 19, 2008 at 9:31 pm
[...] site and that also gives an overview of the project. Jo has also covered the initial premise on her blog posting (which has just popped up while I was writing [...]
June 19, 2008 at 9:46 pm
I wonder whether we could do some sort of unpicking to create coherent threads from the Twitter and Plurk discussions? Plurk is obviously easier but perhaps we could sort through the tweets and create a narrative that someone who wasn’t in the room might understand?
Dunno – just trying to avoid housework
June 20, 2008 at 8:46 am
I was thinking the very same thing, and was going to see if I could find a useful tool to pull out threads in a timeline somehow. I love avoiding housework
June 24, 2008 at 6:21 am
[...] – mainly associate lecturers and OU students. Lots of others have already blogged about it (here, here, and here) so I won’t repeat what they have already said, but the photos from the event are [...]
September 1, 2008 at 10:42 am
[...] in Australia). I guess I expected something closer to the twitter backchannel there was at the Socialearn event I attended earlier this year. However, even after only a day, the Friendfeed room is developing [...]
December 1, 2008 at 1:01 pm
[...] a major channel of communication for me. The experience of a lively twitter back channel at a social Learn event for the OU was [...]
December 2, 2008 at 10:12 am
[...] a major channel of communication for me. The experience of a lively twitter back channel at a social Learn event for the OU was [...]
July 10, 2009 at 6:37 pm
[...] fdomon – jobadge : Social:Learn – a place to organise, share and record learning online in a social [...]